|
Background
In order to
maximize the utilization of the proposed repository facility, the
short-term decay heat generated by high-level waste must be removed
from the waste stream. The
proposed waste management baseline strategy for the GNEP program
calls for the separation of cesium and strontium from used nuclear
fuel in order to minimize the short-term heat loading in the
repository facility. The
separated waste stream will be converted to an aluminosilicate waste
form, stored for decay (approximately 300 years), then managed as
low-level radioactive waste.
The goal of this
project is to examine two potential concerns regarding the long-term
performance of a proposed cesium/strontium waste form.
To facilitate long-term storage, up to 300 years, the
disposal containers will need to be able to survive for the entire
storage interval. The
first aspect of the project will explore the potential interaction
of the aluminosilicate waste form with the storage canister
materials to determine if there is any corrosion or chemical
interaction concerns for the storage of the materials.
At the end of the storage
interval, most of the 137Cs in the waste form will have decayed to its
daughter, 137Ba.
While this decay provides a significant reduction in the
decay heat generated by the waste form, it poses a new concern.
Barium is hazardous, and is identified by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a hazardous constituent
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
To dispose of any material containing a RCRA-identified
constituent, the material must be demonstrated to be durable enough
to prevent the release of the hazardous component or must be treated
as hazardous waste.
For the Cs/Sr waste stream, failure to contain the barium
within the waste form would require disposal as a mixed waste
stream, greatly increasing the disposal costs.
Understanding the potential impacts of radioactive damage,
high storage temperatures, and the crystallographic impacts of the
decay transmutation itself on the performance of the waste form 300
years from now poses a significant challenge.
|
Research
Objectives and Methods
The research effort
at UNLV will be divided into materials compatibility and waste form
performance subtasks.
The materials compatibility subtask will examine the
potential for chemical interactions between the waste form material
and proposed structural materials for the disposal container (carbon
steel, stainless steel, etc.).
The waste form performance subtask will examine the leach
resistance of the waste form, with particular attention to barium
retention. The
performance subtask will also work with the ANL team to develop the
cold analog samples for comparison with the aged 137Cs-bearing
aluminosilicate.
To examine the potential for waste
form-storage materials interactions, coupons of potential container
materials (carbon steel, 316L stainless steel, Inconel 617, and
Zircalloy-2) will be contacted with the Cs/Sr-loaded aluminosilicate
waste form material.
These coupons will be exposed at fixed temperatures for up to
6 months. The
samples will be analyzed for weight loss as well as structural
changes to determine if any material-material interactions would be
expected for this waste form.
The
performance of the waste form will be evaluated using the Toxic
Constituent Leaching Protocol (TCLP), established by the EPA as a
standard analysis to determine if a material requires disposal as a
hazardous waste.
The resistance of the waste form to leaching will be examined
following the TCLP, with a particular focus on barium retention.
Standard dissolution/leaching tests will also be performed
for comparison. To
evaluate the impact of radiologically produced barium in the waste
form, an archived sample of 137Cs-bearing
aluminosilicate material from ANL will be used to examine the
chemical environment of the Ba.
Analog cold samples will be prepared at UNLV for comparison
and baseline measurements, and experimental protocols will be
evaluated with the cold samples to evaluate the feasibility of
performing leach testing on the hot, archived sample.
|